Source: Daily Dose of ShaleDirectories.com News
https://www.shaledirectories.com/blog/unit-corp-appoints-les-austin-as-cfo-svp/
https://www.shaledirectories.com/blog/unit-corp-appoints-les-austin-as-cfo-svp/
https://www.shaledirectories.com/blog/keystone-to-resume-crude-oil-deliveries/
https://www.shaledirectories.com/blog/opec-played-cutbacks-well-now-what/
Independent oil and gas producer in 2016 survived a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, and came out on the other side strong enough to last week announce a $746 million acquisition of a fellow producer.
https://www.shaledirectories.com/blog/icahn-takes-big-stake-in-sandridge-energy/
BP, Eni, ExxonMobil, Repsol, Shell, Statoil, Total and Wintershall this week committed to further reduce methane emissions from natural gas assets they operate around the world, Kallanish Energy reports.
https://www.shaledirectories.com/blog/8-major-producers-commit-to-reduce-methane-emissions/
There’s much to be thankful for this time of year: friends, family, good food and, of course, football. Just as importantly, we should all be thankful for improved U.S. energy security. Thanks to advancements in American energy production such as hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling, the United States is now awash with oil and natural gas, helping to bring families together, keep them warm and put money back in their pockets.
According to the American Automobile Association (AAA), this Thanksgiving week will see the largest number of travelers since 2004. Projecting that roughly 51 million Americans will trek at least 50 miles from home between Wednesday and Sunday – 89 percent of which will be driving – low prices at the pump will have an enormous impact this year. While AAA expects the average gasoline price to be slightly higher than 2016 at $2.54 per gallon, it’s still significantly less than the $2.79 average seen in 2014. Some back of the envelope math shows that with an average fuel efficiency of 25.2 miles per gallon, U.S. drivers will save over $22.5 million on gasoline this week alone compared to 2014.
But it’s not just at the pump where Americans will see savings this Thanksgiving. A report from the Business Council for Sustainable Energy and Bloomberg New Energy finds American consumers are now spending less of their incomes on energy than ever before in the modern era. Covering across-the-board benefits of the rise in natural gas use across the United States, the report finds that shale natural gas production has increased nearly 80 percent since 2011, while overall U.S. natural gas production jumped by 12 percent. Such a massive increase in natural gas supply, along with the addition of 39 gigawatts of natural gas fired generation capacity over the past five years, has helped lower average electricity prices by three percent nationally. Some states have experienced even larger decreases, with retail electricity prices dropping over 10 percent in Texas, New York and Florida during this same time.
In addition to lower electricity prices, the meteoric rise in American natural gas production is helping Americans save when heating their homes or cooking their turkeys. For example, a new study from University of Pennsylvania found that with Pennsylvania’s 2,800 percent increase in natural gas production between 2007 and 2016, gas bills in the state dropped 40 percent over that same period, while the price that utilities are charging customers declined by 75 percent. Nationwide, the report finds, average natural gas prices for the electric power sector declined by 65 percent, while residential gas customers saw a 34 percent decrease in their gas bills. These findings are in line with a A recent Harvard Business School analysis that found, because of shale development, American households have realized low-cost natural gas savings of $800 per household.
As far as overall household energy costs, a 2016 EIA analysis shows that since 2008, roughly the start of the energy renaissance, average annual energy costs per household in the United States have dropped by more than 14 percent.
Businesses are also feeling huge benefits from the significant growth in U.S. natural gas development. According to an American Gas Association report published at the beginning of this year, affordable natural gas from shale development has dropped commercial sector natural gas bills by nearly 50 percent. This reduction translates to a savings of roughly $76 billion since 2009.
These energy savings are currently being enjoyed across the United States despite record oil and natural exports, standing in direct contradiction to what opponents have claimed about exports increasing domestic prices. Total U.S. natural gas exports have more than doubled since 2010, growing by roughly 1.2 trillion cubic feet from 2010 to 2016, with the United States becoming a net exporter of natural gas for the first time in almost six decades. Further, crude oil and petroleum product export reached record levels in the first half of 2017, as crude oil exports grew by more than 300,000 barrels per day from the first half of 2016 to reach 0.9 million barrels per day in the first six months of 2017.
This year while watching the game on TV in your warm house, driving to your in-laws’ house, or pulling that delicious turkey out of your oven, give a little thanks to fracking for not only making these things possible, but saving you money while doing them.
Have a safe and happy Thanksgiving weekend!
Source: Daily Dose of ShaleDirectories.com News
https://www.shaledirectories.com/blog/keystone-pipeline-spill-will-take-months-to-clean-up/
https://www.shaledirectories.com/blog/us-oil-drilling-rig-count-holds-steady-this-week/
https://www.shaledirectories.com/blog/house-tax-reform-vote-set-but-do-oil-gas-companies-benefit/
The Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) last Thursday released a report that claims methane emissions from New Mexico oil and natural gas development “are drastically higher than official state reports.”
The timing of the report is a bit suspect, considering two recent reports have actually found that New Mexico methane emissions are rapidly declining, based on newer data.
The Associated Press reported last week that:
“Methane emissions from oil and natural gas production in New Mexico have dropped by more than 50 percent over the past year thanks to advances in technology and changes in the way wells are drilled, state regulators said Friday.”
Recent data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency also show that methane emissions from oil and natural gas production in the San Juan Basin have declined by 47 percent from 2011 to 2016. The San Juan Basin is home of the infamous methane “hot spot” that environmentalists have long blamed on oil and natural gas, despite conflicting analyses from scientists and federal agencies.
Considering these trends run counter to EDF’s call for duplicative and unnecessary federal methane regulations, EDF’s latest report appears designed to create a counter narrative to the recent double shot of good methane news from EPA and state regulators.
Furthermore, EDF is using its new report to lobby policymakers and convince them to impose additional state regulations on the oil and natural gas industry. EDF even held a joint press call with U.S. Senator Tom Udall (D-N.M.) and several environmental activist groups last week, proving that elected officials like Sen. Udall are being swayed by misleading reports produced by environmentalists.
Let’s take a look at the EDF report’s claims versus the facts.
CLAIM: “The EDF-compiled inventory is based upon a custom analysis combining several data sources including recent studies, the EPA GHG Reporting Program (GHGRP), and EPA’s GHG Inventory (GHGI) national estimates of Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems methane emissions.”
FACT: To be clear, EDF’s analysis is based on computer simulations — and the input data for the computer simulations was outdated, to boot. EDF admits its data is based on “estimated emissions for 2015 in New Mexico.” This is an important factor to consider when evaluating the validity of the EDF report, especially since just one week ago multiple news sources reported on the most recent EPA data showing significant emission reduction over the past year, even as production is on the rise in New Mexico.
That EPA GHGRP is based on actual reported field samples from 2016, as is the New Mexico Energy, Minerals, and Natural Resources Department data that recently reported 52 percent declines over the past year.
Clearly, the more recent data based on actual field samples should be considered more credible.
CLAIM: “A new report based on recent scientific breakthroughs in methane quantification finds that emissions of methane – both a potent greenhouse gas and valuable fuel source – are drastically higher than official state reports.”
FACT: As we’ve mentioned, EDF’s report only runs numbers through 2015. The new state data released last week was based on emissions data through 2016. Notably, that data reported 50 percent reductions since 2015. This pretty much explains why the EDF’s estimates were significantly higher — because EDF didn’t include the latest data that showed emissions have been cut in half since 2015!
Source: EDF Report
CLAIM: “The report offers insights about the largest sources of methane waste in order to help policy makers and operators identify the greatest opportunities to reduce pollution, increase efficiency, and return a valuable commodity to the local economy and state taxpayers.”
FACT: EDF and other environmental groups have long alleged that a vast majority of oil and gas methane emissions can be attributed to so-called “super emitters” present at a very small percentage of oil and gas sites. These so-called “super-emitter” sites are what EDF is referring to in the above claim, and EDF has used the notion of “super emitters” as justification for costly new methane regulations from the EPA and other federal agencies for years.
But importantly, a recent National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) study has revealed that many of the studies used to support the “super emitter” theory were conducted during episodic events, which skewed emissions higher than they typically would be, casting doubt on their conclusions. As a result, these “peak” emission data were inappropriately used to calculate a normal emissions profile by the EPA in its most recent Greenhouse Gas Inventory.
In other words, official regulatory inventories are likely overestimated rather than underestimated, as EDF has repeatedly claimed.
In addition, EDF’s report claims taxpayers are losing royalty revenues due to methane not being captured. Aside from the fact that methane emissions are low and continuing to plummet, EDF does not consider the fact that the type of policy influence they are pushing for with this report will actually have a negative effect and will further reduce production on federal lands, and there’s already a hold up of production on federals due to out of control federal permitting backlog as well as the right of way application backlog holding up quick and efficient transport of oil and natural gas products to market. Last but not least, let’s not forget that uncaptured methane equals revenue losses for oil and gas producers, so there’s motivation for industry to capture all methane.
CLAIM: “New Mexico’s methane waste problem first made international headlines when a 2014 NASA study revealed a 2,500-square-mile methane ‘hot spot’ over the Four Corners region—the highest concentration of this pollution found anywhere in the U.S. Researchers later learned that pollution from New Mexico’s oil and gas facilities were largely the cause of this massive methane cloud.” Furthermore, the EDF report also claims, “Subsequent studies indicated that although the San Juan Basin includes other methane sources such as coal mines and geologic seepage, these sources are not large enough to explain the bulk of emissions, and that oil and gas development is the largest source of emissions contributing to this massive methane ‘hot spot’.”
FACT: Energy in Depth has noted before that the San Juan Basin is well-known as a large area of natural seepage – when methane emissions are naturally occurring and not the result of energy development. According to a 1999 report from the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), “Historically documented naturally occurring gas seeps throughout the San Juan Basin existed prior to oil and gas drilling operations.” Most recently in March 2017, the Associated Press reported that New Mexico state regulators concluded that the four corners methane hot spot predates oil and gas production by “millions of years”:
“New Mexico’s top oil and natural gas regulator said a giant cloud of the greenhouse gas methane hanging over the Southwestern United States comes in large part from natural seeps from underground formations and coal mining operations, disputing recent scientific findings. At a confirmation hearing Wednesday, acting New Mexico Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Secretary Kenley McQueen said the methane hot spot over the Four Corners region of Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah dates back millions of years.”
The most recent GHGRP data showing a 47 percent drop in oil and gas methane emission since 2011 is just the latest evidence casting doubt on the oft-repeated claim that oil and gas development are to blame for the Four Corners “hot spot” in the San Juan Basin.
Conclusion:
On last Thursday’s EDF press call, a reporter with the Carlsbad Current-Argus asked the call organizers if oil and gas operators were already implementing technology to reduce emissions without the need for additional regulations. The response by EDF’s Director of Regulatory & Legislative Affairs is surprisingly complimentary to industry:
“I think it’s right to recognize some oil and gas producers are stepping up on this issue. For instance, XTO, which is the domestic drilling arm of Exxon-Mobil, has made big, big investments in southeastern New Mexico this year,” said Jon Goldstein, Director of Regulatory & Legislative Affairs for EDF. “Six billion dollars poured into the Permian Basin in New Mexico to buy up new acreage. And they have also announced a number of efforts to reduce methane emissions, that really show their commitment to doing this development right and doing right by New Mexico.”
On the call, Goldstein also pointed out the accomplishments by Conoco-Philips in northwestern New Mexico to reduce emissions. Despite Goldstein’s acknowledgment of industry’s efforts and strides in emission reductions, both Senator Udall and EDF will continue a regulatory crusade on the oil and gas industry at any cost. In an EDF press release, Senator Udall said:
“This report gives us an important picture of how much we could gain by taking simple steps to become more efficient. Proven, low-cost fixes could eliminate up to half of the pollution by simply plugging leaks. By capturing that taxpayer-owned resource we can make a big difference for our state’s kids,” said U.S. Senator Tom Udall.
Senator Udall said on the call that he plans to use EDF’s report as “important ammunition” in Washington, D.C., to push for implementation of the Bureau of Land Management’s much maligned venting and flaring rule. Experts agree this rule would potentially put thousands of small operators out of business, and ultimately hurt the state of New Mexico by jeopardizing the $1.6 billion in tax revenue the oil and gas industry contributed to the New Mexico General Fund in 2016.
According to the New Mexico Oil and Gas Association:
“The rules are estimated to cut oil and gas production, resulting in more than $750 million in lost general fund revenue for New Mexico schools, health care, and public safety. The loss in production could also eliminate 2,200 oil and gas jobs and as many as 5,390 direct and indirect full-time jobs.”
Reports coming out of New Mexico put into context what’s at stake for the state of New Mexico should Senator Udall take marching orders from environmental groups like EDF:
Source: Daily Dose of ShaleDirectories.com News“Overall, the oil and gas industry contributes about one-third of New Mexico’s budget each year and employs more than 100,000 workers.”
https://www.shaledirectories.com/blog/rainmaker-wpx-sells-san-juan-gas-assets-closes-jv/
https://www.shaledirectories.com/blog/noble-energy-sells-sliver-of-d-j-basin-for-600-million/
This weekend marked two years since New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced his official investigation into whether ExxonMobil misled investors and the public about the impacts of climate change. Despite several years and significant resources being committed to the investigation, as well as millions of documents turned over by ExxonMobil, Schneiderman has yet to bring forward any formal charges–making it clear that this investigation has more to do with politics than any presumed “fraud” that Schneiderman and his environmental allies have claimed.
The true origins of the #ExxonKnew campaign began back in 2012 during a now-infamous meeting in La Jolla, Calif., between Rockefeller-funded groups and activists who plotted ways to draw parallels between Big Oil and Big Tobacco. The key was to use racketeering laws against energy companies and to recruit sympathetic attorneys general to help with the investigation. Involvement of attorneys general would prove to be integral in the strategy, as activists wanted to use discovery to obtain and publicize documents that could be used to turn public opinion against these companies.
Fast forward to the Summer and Fall of 2015 when reports alleging that ExxonMobil hid climate change research from the public began to appear in InsideClimate News (ICN) and later the Los Angeles Times. Coincidentally, it was disclosed that the wealthy Rockefellers are major sponsors of ICN and commissioned the series that appeared in the LA Times via funding of Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism’s Energy and Environment Reporting Fellowship. Interestingly, the LA Times did not disclose the funders of the fellowship until after outlets like Energy In Depth pointed out the omission. Even the Columbia Journalism Energy and Environment Fellowship page did not originally disclose its sponsors when it first published the series.
Though it’s been two years since the official subpoenas were issued, we know that Schneiderman and his team were looking into ExxonMobil more than a year before the November 2015 announcement. FOIA’d documents have also revealed the collusion and close coordination between the New York Attorney General’s Office and activist groups. Earlier this year, the New York Post reported that the Rockefellers and the New York Attorney General’s office were discussing the #ExxonKnew campaign months before either the ICN or LA Times pieces were published, even though those reports were initially credited for inspiring the investigation.
Then, in January of 2016, #ExxonKnew funders met to coordinate with the groups perpetuating the campaign at the Rockefeller Family Fund headquarters in New York. If their intentions weren’t made apparent from the get-go, a leaked memo from that meeting outlined the goals of the campaign, including their self-described attempt to “delegitimize” Exxon and to “drive divestment” of the company:
This January 2016 meeting included many of the same attendees from the 2012 La Jolla conference such as attorneys Matt Pawa and Sharon Eubanks, Carroll Muffett, and representatives from Greenpeace.
In a show of force shortly after the meeting at Rockefeller headquarters, Eric Schneiderman, flanked by Al Gore and more than a dozen other state attorneys general announced in a press conference that Massachusetts and the Virgin Islands would be pursuing their own investigations of ExxonMobil. Though many other Democratic attorneys general joined in on the photo-op, none of the others actually announced they would be joining in on the investigations.
Unsurprisingly, Rockefeller-funded activists were again behind the March 29th press conference. Reuters reported on FOIA’d emails that showed both Peter Frumhoff of the Union of Concerned Scientists and activist Lawyer Matt Pawa had secretly briefed the attorneys general ahead of the presser. We say secretly because emails later showed an attempt to cover up their involvement with the AGs. The day after the Al Gore press conference, Pawa emailed Lem Srolovic of the New York Attorney General’s office explaining that “a WSJ reporter wants to talk to me. I may not even talk to her at all but if I do I obviously will have no comment on anything discussed at the meeting.” Pawa then asked, “What should I say if she asks if I attended? No comment? Let me know.” Srolovic responded that Pawa should stonewall the press.
“My ask is if you speak to the reporter,” Srolovic wrote, “to not confirm that you attended or otherwise discuss the event.”
Both Frumhoff and Pawa were part of the La Jolla conference in 2012.
Not long after the press conference did things start to unravel for the #ExxonKnew campaign. Virgin Islands Attorney General Claude Walker—one of the few who was actually willing to move forward with an investigation—was forced to withdraw his subpoena relating to the case. Schneiderman and Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey were hit by a barrage of editorials criticizing their campaigns against ExxonMobil, characterizing their actions as an attempt to “stamp out all disagreement,” and voicing concerns about the precedent of pursuing “criminal penalties over those involved in a scientific debate.” Bloomberg News called Schneiderman’s investigation a “dangerous arrogation of power,” while the Boston Herald called Healey’s actions a “foolish effort to basically try to regulate speech.”
Two years later, the campaign has effectively faded from the public’s collective view without much to show for it.
EID crafted a new infographic to display how fruitless this investigation has been, which can be viewed here.
In sum, Schneiderman’s investigation has produced:
https://www.shaledirectories.com/blog/exxonknew-two-years-of-harassment-zero-legal-charges/
The volume of working gas in storage continues to creep up, two weeks ago increasing by 1.8% from the previous week’s total, the Energy Information Administration reports.
https://www.shaledirectories.com/blog/working-gas-in-storage-continues-climbing/